Two-Phase Commit (2PC)

A coordinator asks participants to prepare, then commits or rolls back all participants.

consistency

Detailed Description

2PC provides atomicity but fights the autonomy and availability goals of microservices.

Most microservice systems prefer sagas, outbox, idempotency, and compensation instead.

Phase 1: prepare all
All yes -> commit all
Any no -> rollback all

Pros

True atomicity across resources

Cons

Blocking, coordinator SPOF, poor scalability

Examples: XA transactions; rarely preferred in microservices